Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2016 Jun 1.
Published in final edited form as: Early Hum Dev. 2015 May 4;91(6):373–379. doi: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2015.03.011

Table 3.

Logistic Regression Model of Receptive Language Delay at 30 Months: English Language Only

Variable % with
Receptive
Delay
OR 95% CI p
Feeding status at 18 months
  Eats with assistance/tube fed 60 1.96 1.22, 3.15 0.006
  Feeds self 47 REF
Treatment condition
  Glutamine 55 1.39 0.88, 2.20 0.156
  Control 50 REF
Gender
  Male 58 1.64 1.03, 2.60 0.035
  Female 49 REF
Birth weight (kg) -- 0.71 0.10, 5.30 0.741
Gestational age -- 1.18 1.01, 1.38 0.036
Race/Ethnicity
  White 35 0.31 0.19, 0.50 < 0.001
  Non-White 71 REF
Maternal Education Level
  Less than high school 73 1.94 0.95, 3.96 0.070
  High school graduate 59 REF
  Some college or more 41 0.70 0.40, 1.21 0.200
Income
  $50,000 or more 35 0.36 0.18, 0.69 0.002
  $20,000–$49,999 47 0.45 0.26, 0.79 0.005
  < $20,000 73 REF
Postnatal steroids
  Yes 56 1.21 0.68, 2.16 0.513
  No 51 REF
BPD
  Yes 55 1.82 1.08, 3.08 0.024
  No 51 REF
IVH/PVL
  Yes 57 1.40 0.61, 3.23 0.430
  No 52 REF

Note: N=400. REF=reference category. Percent represents the proportion of children with characteristic who have a receptive language delay.