Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2016 Jun 1.
Published in final edited form as: Early Hum Dev. 2015 May 4;91(6):373–379. doi: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2015.03.011

Table 4.

Logistic Regression Model of Expressive Language Delay at 30 Months: English Language Only

Variable % with
Expressive
Delay
OR 95% CI p
Feeding status at 18 months
  Eats with assistance/tube fed 67 2.52 1.26, 5.03 0.009
  Feeds self 42 REF
Treatment condition
  Glutamine 53 0.92 0.49, 1.74 0.803
  Control 53 REF
Gender
  Male 54 0.85 0.44, 1.64 0.633
  Female 52 REF
Birth weight (kg) -- 0.75 0.05, 12.11 0.836
Gestational age -- 1.06 0.86, 1.32 0.588
Race/Ethnicity
  White 34 0.23 0.12, 0.46 < 0.001
  Non-White 75 REF
Maternal Education Level
  Less than high school 70 1.67 0.59, 4.68 0.334
  High school graduate 56 REF
  Some college or more 45 0.90 0.42, 1.92 0.784
Income
  $50,000 or more 33 0.43 0.17, 1.07 0.070
  $20,000–$49,999 55 0.73 0.31, 1.68 0.454
  < $20,000 74 REF
Postnatal steroids
  Yes 55 0.90 0.40, 2.04 0.809
  No 52 REF
BPD
  Yes 50 1.12 0.55, 2.28 0.759
  No 56 REF
IVH/PVL
  Yes 60 1.19 0.32, 4.41 0.800
  No 53 REF

Note: N=208. REF=reference category. Percent represents the proportion of children with characteristic who have an expressive language delay.