Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2016 Jun 1.
Published in final edited form as: Psychol Assess. 2014 Nov 24;27(2):365–376. doi: 10.1037/pas0000036

Table 3.

Reliability of Attention Bias Variability (ABV) index as a function of outlier handling method

Study 1 (N=29; 320 trials)
Adult Social Anxiety Disorder
Study 2 (N=15; 160 trials)
Adult Social Anxiety Disorder
Study 3 (N=28; 48 trials)
Pediatric Healthy Volunteers

Method/measure ICC
(single
measure)
ICC/alpha
(average of
all
measures)
p ICC
(single
measure)
ICC/alpha
(average of
all
measures)
p ICC
(single
measure)
ICC/alpha
(average of
all
measures)
p

Rescale (Windsorize) RTs
 Attention Bias Variability Index .39 .88 <.001 .14 .57 .006 .15 .47 .01

Delete RTs <300 & >2500 & ±3 SDs
from individual’s session mean
 Attention Bias Variability Index .63 .95 <.001 .13 .54 .02 .21 .57 .001

Delete RTs <300 & >3000 & ±2 SDs
from individual’s session mean
 Attention Bias Variability Index .65 .96 <.001 .22 .69 .001 .30 .68 <.001

Note: RTs=reaction times. Significant ICC’s obtained in every analysis. Method yielding the highest overall reliability for each study is highlighted in pink.