Skip to main content
. 2015 Mar 4;89(10):5569–5580. doi: 10.1128/JVI.00309-15

TABLE 1.

Effects of SEVI treatment on the interaction of HIV with ectocervical and endocervical tissues from 12 human donors

Parameter Value for group
Ectocervix
Endocervix
SEVI SEVI+ P SEVI SEVI+ P
Median total no. of virions (interquartile range)a 198.5 (28.5, 235.5) 93 (52, 109.5) 0.26 49.5 (14, 123.5) 35.5 (8.5, 68) 0.72
Total no. of virions/total no. of images (no. of virions/image) 1,876/300 (6.25) 1,204/300 (4.01) 872/300 (2.91) 477/300 (1.59)
Median no. of penetrators (interquartile range)a 56.5 (17, 80.5) 8.5 (4.5, 21) 0.02 15 (9.5, 40.5) 16.5 (7, 38) 0.98
No. of penetrators/total no. of images (no. of penetrators/image) 615/300 (2.05) 221/300 (0.737) 417/300 (1.39) 300/300 (1.00)
No. of penetrators/total no. of virions (%) 615/1,876 (33) 221/1,204 (18) 417/872 (48) 300/477 (63)
Prevalence ratio (SEVI+ vs SEVI) (95% confidence interval)b 0.56 (0.34, 0.91) 0.02 1.32 (0.92, 1.89) 0.14
Avg penetration depth (μm)c
    Including nonpenetrators 1.55 1.05 0.001 5.65 10.08 <0.0001
    Among penetrators 4.72 5.74 0.08 11.81 16.03 <0.0001
No. of penetrators <15 μm/total no. of penetrators (%)d 570/615 (93) 196/221 (89) 0.07 312/417 (75) 185/300 (62) 0.0002
Max penetration depth (μm) 48.7 41.5 66.7 63.1
a

Median numbers of virions (interquartile range) from all 12 donors. Exact Wilcoxon two-sample tests were performed to compare conditions without SEVI (SEVI) to those with SEVI (SEVI+).

b

The prevalence ratio (95% confidence interval) and P value were estimated from log-binomial regression models using generalized estimating equations to adjust for repeated measures.

c

Average penetration depth per virion from all 12 donors. t tests were performed to compare conditions without SEVI to those with SEVI.

d

P values obtained by chi-square tests.