Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2015 May 25.
Published in final edited form as: Proteins. 2010 Jun;78(8):1926–1938. doi: 10.1002/prot.22706

Figure 6.

Figure 6

Predicted ligand binding geometries of the best designs for 5, 7, and 2 compared to the crystallographic conformation of 1. The helix (res:150–163) is shown for reference. The binding geometry of 5 is very similar to 1. The 2-Nitro-4,5-DimethoxyPh protecting group of 7 can lay along the helix in an unstrained conformation. However, the requirement that 2 bound in a planar conformation was a significant complication that lead to less favorable designs.