Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2016 May 1.
Published in final edited form as: Neurotoxicology. 2015 Feb 24;48:90–99. doi: 10.1016/j.neuro.2015.02.003

Table 1.

Description of neurobehavioral tests and functions for BARS

Test Description Function Variables
Finger tapping (TAP)
  • Right and left hand taps for 20 seconds; 2 trials/hand

Response speed and coordination
  • Average number of taps each hand*

Divided attention (DAT)
  • Tap while reciting nursery rhyme (Chang song)

Divided attention
  • Average number of taps each hand while singing*

Purdue pegboard (PEG)
  • Number of small pegs placed in holes during two 30 second trials each hand

  • Preferred, non-preferred, and both hand trials

Dexterity
  • Average number of pegs placed: preferred, non-preferred, both*

Visual motor integration (VMI)
  • Copied line drawing

Hand-Eye coordination
  • Total score for correct segments*

Digit span (DST)
  • Spoken presentation of number sequences

  • Forward and reverse recall

Memory and attention
  • raw score forward, backward, total*

Object memory test (OMT)
  • Show and name 16 objects

  • Immediate and delayed recall

  • Recognition of target and non-target items

Recall and recognition memory
  • Immediate recall; delayed recall; recognition*

Symbol-Digit (SDT)
  • Match number and symbol from key

Information processing speed
  • Average latency (ms) of response for correct match#

Match-to-Sample (MTS)
  • 15 stimuli shown for 3 seconds

  • Identify target from 3 choices

  • Delay between presentation and choice varies from 1 to 8 seconds

Visual memory
  • Average latency (ms) for correct choice#

  • Number correct*

Continuous performance (CPT)
  • Different shapes shown rapidly for 4 min in original version and 7 min in alternate version

  • Press key when target (original = circle; alternate = triangle) shown

Sustained attention
  • Percent correct*

  • Average latency (ms) for correct response (hit)#

  • Average latency (ms) for false alarms#

  • D-Prime*

Adapted in part from Rohlman et al. (2007b).

*

Higher number indicates better performance

#

Lower number indicates better performance