Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2016 Jun 15.
Published in final edited form as: J Surg Res. 2015 Mar 6;196(2):285–293. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2015.02.071

Table 1.

Potential miR regulators of p85α

miR Tumor vs. Benigna Conserved Sitesb p85α Correlationc
miR-21 1.42 2 −0.09
miR-617 −1.13 1 −0.46
miR-525-5p −0.94 1 −0.45
miR-936 −1.52 1 −0.43
miR-488 −3.97 1 −0.41
miR-519 −0.37 1 −0.40
miR-635 −1.28 1 −0.40
miR-486-5p −0.40 1 −0.38
miR-634 0.24 1 −0.34
miR-127-5p −0.84 1 −0.26
miR-498 0.71 1 −0.25
miR-656 0.96 1 −0.24
miR-650 0.03 1 −0.24
miR-1285 0.01 1 −0.22
miR-1229 1.02 1 −0.21
miR-554 −0.31 1 −0.17
miR-548o 0.45 1 −0.16
miR-330-3p −0.53 1 −0.14
miR-455-3p 0.50 1 −0.14
miR-767-5p −1.40 1 −0.10
miR-495 0.38 1 −0.06
miR-221 1.01 1 −0.05
miR-15a 0.23 1 −0.01
miR-548g 0.19 1 −0.01
a

Log-transformed p-value of Student’s T-test comparing expression in PDAC tumor cells vs. normal ductal epithelium based on miR array. A positive (negative) value indicates higher (lower) expression in tumor as compared to normal cells.

b

Number of predicted binding sites in p85α 3′UTR for each miR.

c

Correlation coefficient between miR and p85α (mRNA) expression levels in PDAC tumor cells.