Skip to main content
. 2015 Jun;145(6):489–511. doi: 10.1085/jgp.201411281

Figure 3.

Figure 3.

Simulation of calcium sparks with different activation site–related parameters of the RyR gating model. (A) Typical simulations for cytosolic [Ca2+] of 0.05 (top row) and 0.4 µM (bottom row) for (left to right) control, a threefold decrease of KCa, a threefold increase of KMg, a threefold decrease of fCa and fMg, and a twofold increase of pdis. (B–G) The calcium dependence of the frequency of triggered sparks (ΔϕSpark; B), the increase of the average number of open RyRs in triggered sparks (ΔnO; C), spontaneous spark frequency (ϕSpark; D), calcium sensitivity of spontaneous spark frequency (CaϕSpark; E), average number of open RyRs in spontaneous sparks (nO; F), and calcium sensitivity of the average number of open RyRs in spontaneous sparks (CanO; G) for control conditions (black symbols) and for decreased (red symbols) and increased (blue symbols) parameters KCa, KMg, fCa, pdis, and fMg. The parameters were changed to 33 and 300% of control, except for pdis that was changed to 50 and 200% of control. Theoretical predictions (D–G) and predictions of multiple linear regression (B and C) are shown by solid lines. Theoretical values and data from simulations at calcium concentrations used in the experiment (Lukyanenko and Gyorke, 1999) shown in Fig. 1 are shown as open and closed symbols, respectively. Error bars represent mean ± SEM.