Skip to main content
. 2015 Mar 15;8(3):3869–3875.

Table 2.

Comparison of complete blood count parameters among the groups

Group 1 Group 3 P value

HTC (%) 40 ± 5 39.2 ± 7.9 NS
PLT (× 103 cells/μL) 272 ± 108 254 ± 56 NS
MPV (fL) 8.9 ± 1.6 8.4 ± 0.8 0.038
PDW (%) 40.4 ± 17.6 32.7 ± 15.8 0.022
EOS (%) 3.7 ± 4.9 3.2 ± 1.7 NS

Group 2 Group 3 P value

HTC (%) 38.7 ± 7.9 39.2 ± 7.9 NS
PLT (× 103 cells/μL) 278 ± 111 254 ± 56 NS
MPV (fL) 8.3 ± 1.8 8.4 ± 0.8 NS
PDW (%) 35.7 ± 17.1 32.7 ± 15.8 NS
EOS (%) 3.3 ± 2.7 3.2 ± 1.7 NS

Group 1 Group 2 P value

HTC (%) 40 ± 5 38.7 ± 7.9 NS
PLT (× 103 cells/μL) 272 ± 108 278 ± 111 NS
MPV (fL) 8.9 ± 1.6 8.3 ± 1.8 0.009
PDW (%) 40.4 ± 17.6 35.7 ± 17.1 0.032
EOS (%) 3.7 ± 4.9 3.3 ± 2.7 NS

HTC: haematocrit, PLT: platelet count, MPV: mean platelet volume, PDW: platelet distribution width, EOS: percentage of eosinophils, NS: not significant. Data are presented as means ± standard deviation.