Skip to main content
. 2015 Mar 18;113(9):3345–3355. doi: 10.1152/jn.00973.2014

Table 2.

Comparison of thermal pain sensation between C57BL/6 and BALB/c

C57BL/6J (s)
BALB/cJ (s)
Project/Pain Tests Sex Regions n Means ± SE n Means ± SE
Mogil1
    Tail-flick test, 47.5°C Male Tail 5 5.8 ± 0.6 5 8.7 ± 0.5*
    Tail-flick test, 49°C Male Tail 10 2.2 ± 0.1 10 4.6 ± 0.2*
    Hargreaves' test Male Hind paw 6 8.2 ± 0.3 6 16.3 ± 1.7*
    Hot-plate test Male Hind paw 8 19.3 ± 1.7 8 32.7 ± 3.7*
Jaxwest1
    Hot-plate test Male Hind paw 8 5.5 ± 0.7 8 11.1 ± 1.3*
    Hot-plate test Female Hind paw 8 6.4 ± 0.6 8 10.6 ± 1.1*
This study
    Hargreaves' test Female Hind paw 15 3.4 ± 0.2 15 7.5 ± 0.3*
    Hargreaves' test Female Whisker pad 15 2.4 ± 0.1 15 8.3 ± 0.5*

Values represent means ± SE; n = number of animals. Thermal pain behavior data from the “Heritability of Nociception Project,” which is publicly available (http://www.jax.org/phenome).

*

P < 0.01, with Mann-Whitney U test.