Table 2.
Total (n=186) | |
---|---|
Experiences during screening: Quality of care received rated as good-to-excellent |
96.2% |
Felt treated with dignity and respect | 98.4% |
Was not subjected to more tests/procedures than necessary | 97.9% |
Did not feel treated as a guinea pig during screening | 98.9% |
Was given enough time to talk with the person who conducted the screening | 97.9% |
Felt that questions were answered to satisfaction | 98.9% |
Felt a great deal comfortable with the person who conducted the screening | 78.0% |
Felt they could trust the person who conducted the screening a great deal | 67.2% |
Understanding of HAMS: Felt they understood the screening process very well |
86.6% |
Understood very well what HAMS are usually trying to study | 81.2% |
Understood very well what they have to do if they joined a clinical trial | 84.4% |
Future enrollment and recommendations: Very willing to get screened again for an HAMS |
80.1% |
Would recommend a close friend living with HIV to get screened for an HAMS at the site where they last got screened | 98.4% |
Would recommend a family member living with HIV to get screened for an HAMS where they last got screened† | 96.2% |
Response missing for three participants.