Table 5.
Evaluation of new symptoms in patients with prior autoimmune encephalitis. This is a difficult area but several guidelines can be offered:
| • The clinical findings are paramount. Worsening of the specific neurological findings without an alternative cause trumps antibody tests, radiology, and CSF analysis. |
| • Progression of findings on MRI (such as T2 signal changes in the temporal lobes) often supports disease activity. |
| • Seizures usually resolve with treatment of the autoimmune encephalitis. Therefore new or worsened seizures may suggest relapse. |
| • If the CSF is bland and the antibody response is no longer present, the patients’ symptoms are less likely to be due to the autoimmune encephalitis. |
| • If the CSF shows signs of inflammation, this favors and active disease process. |
| • CSF results may be ambiguous: the antibody response persists but there is no evidence of inflammation. |
| • Sera titers are not generally useful since antibody response can persist in the sera and not the CSF or vice versa. |
| • CSF titers may be useful with these caveats: samples from different time points must be studied carefully side by side in a skilled lab, the titer must change by at least two points of measurement (e.g. not 1:10 to 1:20). A significant increase in titer compared to CSF obtained during a remission favors a relapse. |