Skip to main content
. 2015 May;20(4):e13–e19. doi: 10.1093/pch/20.4.e13

TABLE 2.

Association between mechanical ventilation (MV) practices and the presence of MV protocols

Variable Protocol (n=9) No protocol (n=15) Overall (n=24)
Initial mode of MV
  Not specified 56 40 46
  Assist control – volume control 33 20 25
  Assist control – pressure control 11 20 17
  Synchronized intermittent mandatory
  Ventilation with pressure support 0 20 13
Use of blood gas, transcutaneous and end-tidal CO2 for titration 75 (6/8) 47 57
Use of permissive hypercapnia*
  PCO2 allowed to rise to a preset maximum 33 27 29
  PCO2 allowed to rise as long as pH is within a preset range 67 80 75
Plateau pressures limited 50 (4/8) 50 (7/14) 50 (11/22)
PEEP titrated*
  Based on predetermined SpO2 levels 33 27 29
  Based on arterial blood gas results 22 26.7 25
  Based on set FiO2 44 33 38
  Based on chest x-ray evaluation 22 40 33
Mode of MV pre-extubation*
  Assist control 75 (6/8) 27 44 (10/23)
  Synchronized intermittent mandatory ventilation 63 (5/8) 80 74 (17/23)
  Volume guarantee 63 (5/8) 33 44 (10/23)
  High-frequency oscillatory ventilation 50 (4/8) 20 30 (7/23)
  High-frequency jet ventilation 13 (1/8) 0 4 (1/23)
Type of postextubation support*
  Low-flow nasal cannula 56 20 33
  High-flow nasal cannula 44 47 46
  Continuous positive airway pressure 100 93 96
Noninvasive positive pressure ventilation 67 33 46
*

Total percentage may be >100% in this category because respondents could choose more than one answer;

Statistically significant (P=0.039; OR 8.25 [95% CI 1.15 to 59])