Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2016 May 21.
Published in final edited form as: Phys Med Biol. 2015 Apr 28;60(10):3999–4013. doi: 10.1088/0031-9155/60/10/3999

Table 5.

Results from risk optimization, describing which treatment plan confers the lowest predicted risk of second cancer following prostate radiotherapy. Results were obtained with normal tissue DVH constraints for linear and non-linear risk models. Axial slices of the treatment plans are shown in figure 1.


With DVH Constraints

Risk model Plan description Gantry Angles (degrees) Beam Weights ERR bladder ERR rectum Plan Label
iirp (Shuryak et al) Anterior and Lateral parallel-opposed 0, 90, 270 0.9, 0.05, 0.05 0.73 0.14 C
Linear-non-threshold Lateral parallel-opposed 90, 270 0.5, 0.5 5.46 2.07 A
Linear-exponential-10 Anterior and Lateral parallel-opposed 0, 90, 270 0.9, 0.05, 0.05 0.32 0.09 C
Linear-exponential-40 Lateral parallel-opposed 90, 270 0.5, 0.5 1.54 0.59 A
Linear-plateau-10 Lateral parallel-opposed 90, 270 0.5, 0.5 0.74 0.27 A
Linear-plateau-40 Lateral parallel-opposed 90, 270 0.5, 0.5 1.74 0.65 A