Skip to main content
. 2015 May 26;10(5):e0128158. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0128158

Table 2. Correlations (Pearson’s r) among the predictor variables.

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12
(1) Openness to experience —- .02 .14 .13 -.07 .49 .29 -.04 .24 .12 .00 .06
(2) Conscientiousness [-.06,. 10] —- .17 .22 -.15 -.12 .44 -.06 .19 -.35 -.06 .01
(3) Extraversion [.06,. 22] [.09,. 25] —- .07 -.26 .03 .31 -.27 .47 -.24 -.11 .05
(4) Agreeableness [.05,. 21] [.14,. 30] [-.01,. 15] —- -.25 .08 .03 .02 .04 -.20 -.06 .06
(5) Neuroticism [-.15,. 01] [-.23,-.07] [-.34,-.18] [-.33,-.17] —- .10 -.23 .73 -.08 .45 -.28 -.14
(6) Absorption [.42,. 55] [-.20,-.04] [-.05,. 11] [.00,. 16] [.02,. 18] —- .07 .16 .26 .47 -.09 .01
(7) Achievement Motivation [.21,. 36] [.37,. 51] [.23,. 38] [-.05,. 11] [-.31,-.15] [-.01,. 15] —- -.26 .47 -.14 .14 -.01
(8) BIS [-.12,. 04] [-.14,. 02] [-.35,-.19] [-.06,. 10] [.69,. 77] [.08,. 24] [-.34,-.18] —- -.02 .37 -.35 -.12
(9) BAS [.16,. 32] [.11,. 27] [.40,. 53] [-.04,. 12] [-.16,. 00] [.18,. 34] [.40,. 53] [-.10,. 06] —- .03 -.06 -.07
(10) Schizotypy [.04,. 20] [-.42,-.28] [-.32,-.16] [-.28,. 12] [.38,. 51] [.40,. 53] [-.22,-.06] [.30,. 44] [-.05,. 11] —- -.11 -.07
(11) Gender [-.18,. 18] [-.14,. 02] [-.19,-.03] [-.14,. 02] [-.36,-.20] [-.17,-.01] [.06,. 22] [-.42,-.28] [-.14,. 02] [-.19,-.03] —- .03
(12) Age [-.02,. 14] [-.07,. 09] [-.03,. 13] [-.02,. 14] [-.22,-.06] [-.07,. 09] [-.09,. 07] [-.20,-.04] [-.15,. 01] [-.15,. 01] [-.05,. 11] —-

Note. The lower and upper bounds of the 95% confidence interval are shown in square brackets below the diagonal. Correlational values ≥ |.09| are significant at an alpha level of. 05, values ≥ |.12| are significant at an alpha level of. 01, and values ≥ |.15| are significant at an alpha level of. 001. N = 554 for all correlations