Table 2A.
N | 5% | 10% | 25% | 50% | 75% | 90% | 95% | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Females | ||||||||
Lateral Femur | 236 | 30.9 | 31.7 | 33.1 | 34.6 | 36.9 | 37.8 | 38.8 |
Lateral Tibia | 212 | 25.6 | 26.7 | 28.4 | 30.6 | 32.9 | 35.1 | 36.4 |
Medial Femur | 225 | 34.1 | 34.9 | 36.3 | 38.0 | 39.8 | 41.4 | 42.4 |
Medial Tibia | 250 | 26.8 | 27.8 | 29.4 | 31.4 | 33.5 | 35.5 | 36.7 |
Patella | 163 | 27.7 | 28.7 | 30.4 | 32.4 | 34.5 | 36.5 | 37.8 |
Males | ||||||||
Lateral Femur | 207 | 31.0 | 31.7 | 32.8 | 34.2 | 35.6 | 36.9 | 37.7 |
Lateral Tibia | 192 | 25.4 | 26.4 | 28.3 | 30.6 | 33.0 | 35.4 | 36.9 |
Medial Femur | 198 | 33.5 | 34.2 | 35.5 | 37.0 | 38.5 | 40.0 | 40.8 |
Medial Tibia | 218 | 27.3 | 28.3 | 30.0 | 32.1 | 34.3 | 36.5 | 37.8 |
Patella | 172 | 27.6 | 28.6 | 30.2 | 32.2 | 34.3 | 36.2 | 37.5 |
A logarithmic transformation was applied to the data to obtain a normal distribution, and percentile values of the log-transformed T2 data were calculated (using means and standard deviations) in each compartment. Finally, the data was reverse-transformed to quantify T2 values for various percentiles of the sample.