Skip to main content
. 2015 May 27;35(21):8201–8213. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3075-14.2015

Table 2.

Cortical regions demonstrating a significant linear or logarithmic relationship with stimulus contrast

x y z Z stat
Controls
    Right hemifield
        Linear model
            Left V4 −24 −78 −8 4.5
            Left V1 −10 −88 2 3.7
            Left hMT+ −44 −78 8 3.4
        Logarithmic model
            Left V4 −24 −68 −16 4.1
            Left hMT+ −36 −72 8 3.6
    Left hemifield
        Linear model
            Right V1 12 −82 −2 3.8
            Right hMT+ 46 −66 8 3.5
        Logarithmic model
            Right hMT+ 46 −66 6 3.6
            Right V1/V2 border 12 −80 0 3.3
Patients
    Blind right hemifield
        Linear model
            Left hMT+ −40 −62 6 3.2
        Logarithmic model
            No significant activity
    Sighted left hemifield
        Linear model
            Right V1 22 −84 −2 3.3
            Right optic radiation/V1 border 30 −62 0 3.4
            Right V4 28 −66 −8 3.2
            Left hMT+ −46 −72 4 3.1
        Logarithmic model
            Right paracingulate gyrus 2 32 40 4.1
            Left hMT+ −40 −70 14 3.9
            Right hMT+ 48 −64 16 3.6

Only the most significant peak within each region of activation is reported, with its corresponding MNI coordinates and Z statistic. A statistical threshold of p < 0.001 uncorrected was used for a priori ROIs; elsewhere, correction for multiple comparisons was made with a cluster threshold of p < 0.05, mixed-effects analysis. Values for hMT+ are shown in bold.