Skip to main content
. 2015 May 13;2015:290234. doi: 10.1155/2015/290234

Table 3.

Subgroup analysis of complications between LCVP and control group.

Subgroup Study Case (n/N) Heterogeneity Effect size
LCVP Control I 2 P RR(95% CI) P
Diagnosis
  Chest infection [14, 1820, 23, 25] 20/283 37/327 0% 0.96 0.56 (0.35, 0.90) 0.02
  Pleural effusion [14, 1820, 23, 25] 41/283 57/327 43% 0.12 0.72 (0.51, 1.02) 0.06
  Wound infection [14, 23] 5/120 7/111 0% 0.75 0.64 (0.21, 1.93) 0.43
  Ascites [14, 18, 23] 12/140 22/169 0% 0.81 0.56 (0.29, 1.08) 0.08
  Heart disorder [18, 20] 1/87 2/141 0% 0.40 1.36 (0.19, 9.67) 0.76
  Bile leakage [18, 20] 2/80 2/111 0% 0.75 1.41 (0.22, 9.23) 0.72
  Bleeding [18, 20] 0/80 3/111 0% 0.45 0.35 (0.05, 2.67) 0.31
  Hepatic insufficiency [18, 20] 3/80 5/111 0% 0.49 0.90 (0.21, 3.85) 0.88
  Sepsis [18, 20] 3/103 4/101 0% 0.33 0.77 (0.20, 3.02) 0.71
Methods
 IVCC versus control [14, 18, 20, 23] 52/207 69/252 0% 0.50 0.83 (0.62, 1.11) 0.2
 IAC versus control [15, 19, 25] 47/101 68/100 0% 0.70 0.68 (0.55, 0.86) 0.009
Total
 LCVP versus control [14, 15, 1820, 23, 25] 99/308 137/352 0% 0.71 0.75 (0.63, 0.91) 0.003