Table 3.
Clinical evaluation results of 7 cases
| S. No | Esthetic contour | Tongue movements | Jaw movements | Mouth opening | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Post-op (mm) | Pre-op (mm) | ||||
| Case 1 | Satisfied | Unrestricted | Non-restricted | 38 | 32 |
| Case 2 | Good | Non-restricted | 38 | 35 | |
| Case 3 | Satisfied | Slight deviation to right side | 40 | 43a | |
| Case 4 | Good | Deviation to right side | 38 | 26 | |
| Case 5 | Good | No gross change | 40 | 36 | |
| Case 6 | Good | Non-restricted | 35 | 38a | |
| Case 7 | Good | Slight deviation to right side | 42 | 32 | |
aPre-operatively interincisal distance taken, post-operatively lower teeth were missing replaced by midline of lower reconstructed ridge as measurement landmark