Table 1. Thermodynamic parameters for Atox1-WD4 Cu+ transfer.
Reaction mixture | Parameter | Step 1 | Step 2 | Overall |
---|---|---|---|---|
Cu-Atox1C1C2 + WD4C1C2 | ΔGSEC (kJ/mol) | −30.1 | +24.6 | −5.5 |
KSEC | 0.42·106 M−1 | 26.1·10−6 M | 11.0 | |
ΔHITC (kJ/mol) | −25.1 | +14.0 | −11.1 | |
TΔSITC (kJ/mol) | +5.0 | −10.6 | −5.6 | |
Cu-Atox1C1C2 + WD4C1A2 | ΔGSEC (kJ/mol) | −26.5 | ||
KSEC | 0.09·106 M−1 | |||
KITC | 0.05·106 M−1 | |||
ΔHITC (kJ/mol) | −52 | |||
TΔSITC (kJ/mol) | −26 | |||
Atox1C1A2 + Cu-WD4C1C2 | ΔGSEC (kJ/mol) | +30.5 | ||
KSEC | 2·10−6 M | |||
KITC | 17·10−6 M | |||
ΔHITC (kJ/mol) | +52 | |||
TΔSITC (kJ/mol) | +24 |
Step 1 and Step 2 relate to Fig. 1. The data for the wild type reaction, involving both Steps 1 and 2, is taken from26. The mutant data comes from SEC (Fig. 2; apparent K values estimated from concentrations derived from elution profiles) and ITC (Fig. 3; K, ΔH and ΔS was determined by fitting of ITC data to a 1:1 binding model) experiments and formation of Atox1C1C2-Cu-WD4C1A2 corresponds to Step 1 whereas dissociation of the Atox1C1A2-Cu-WD4C1C2 complex corresponds to Step 2 in Fig. 1. Errors may reach 5%. See text for further details.