. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2015 Jul 1.

Published in final edited form as: Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf. 2015;41(4):186–183. doi: 10.1016/s1553-7250(15)41024-4

Table 3.

Correlations between RRT Characteristics and Hospital Type and Size

Variable	N (%)^a	Hospital Type^b	Hospital Size^c
Number of teams	31(100)	.392^d^* (p = .029)	.431^d^* (p=.016)
Number of persons on team	31 (100)	-	-
Number of post-RRT activities	31(100)	-	-
Debriefing	10(32)	.453^e^* (p=.012)	.515^e^* (p=.016)
Reassessed ≤ 24hrs	13(42)	-	-
Staff evaluates RRT	19(61)	-	-
RRT outcomes shared	21 (68)	-	-
RRTM performance	18(58)	-	-
Dedicated RRT	7 (23)	-	.462^e^* (p=0.037)
RRT Oversight	19(61)	-	-
Team Leader	31(100)	-	-
RN-Led	22 (71)	-	-
MD-Led	3 (10)	-	.443^e^* (p=.048)
Co-Led MD/RN	6 (20)	-	-

Note.

total percentage value may be greater than 100 because of rounding

teaching and non-teaching

small (0 – 150), medium = (151 – 500), and large (= ≥ 501)

Point-Biseral correlations:

Cramer's V correlations

significant at the .05 level

(-) = not significant at the .05 level.