Table 7. Flavor selectivity in cue-selective neurons recorded in lesion vs. sham rats, statistics.
Planned comparisons (each tests whether indices are significantly shifted from zero): | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
time X direction X group | lesion: preferred direction |
lesion: anti-preferred direction |
absolute value of indices | ||||
early in blocks | late in blocks | early in blocks | late in blocks | late in blocks, preferred vs. anti- preferred @ lesion | late in blocks, (preferred vs. anti-preferred) X (sham vs. lesion) | ||
F | 0.0 | 1.7 | 0.3 | 0.4 | 1.6 | 17.0 | 20.8 |
df | 1,90 | 1,90 | 1,90 | 1,90 | 1,90 | 1,90 | 1,90 |
p | 0.88 | 0.19 | 0.57 | 0.54 | 0.21 | <0.0001 | <0.0001 |
In addition to the results in the table, there were no effects of group: main effect, F1,90=0.06, p=0.81; group X time, F1,90=0.62, p=0.43; group X direction, F1,90=1.3, p=0.26. In the last two columns, the magnitude of flavor indices (absolute value) late in the block was tested, demonstrating that neurons in the lesion group, like shams, had significantly larger indices in the preferred direction, and also that lesions enhanced the degree to which neurons encode flavor, compared to shams. df = degrees of freedom.