Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2015 May 27.
Published in final edited form as: Med Phys. 2003 Jul;30(7):1671–1682. doi: 10.1118/1.1578911

Table II.

Registration results of range scan data to CT data (organ phantom) and physical space data (calibration phantom). Target set (a) represents a nylon screw head on the liver’s surface. Target set (b) refers to the peripheral Teflon spheres that were used as fiducials in the point-based registration but were not used in the surface registration. Target set (c) are points on the calibration phantom not used as fiducials. For each of the 12 trials, there were 126 unique combinations of five fiducials and four targets.

Phantom Scaling Registration method FRE (points)/ Residual (surface), mm TRE, mm
Organ Rigid Point 2.2±1.3 (6.0) n=119 (a) 1.7±0.5 (2.5) n=11
Organ Similarity Point 1.1±0.8 (3.5) n=119 (a) 1.8±0.5 (2.7) n=11
Organ Rigid Surface 0.75±0.07 (0.83) n=6 (a) 2.0±0.6 (2.7) n=6
(b) 4.1±1.7 (8.1) n=42
Organ Similarity Surface 0.65±0.04 (0.70) n=6 (a) 2.4±0.5 (3.0) n=6
(b) 3.6±1.7 (7.2) n=42
Calibration phantom Rigid Point 1.0±0.6 (3.8) n=7560 (c) 1.4±0.7 (4.8) n=6048