Skip to main content
. 2015 May 27;10(5):e0128641. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0128641

Table 2. Spearman rank correlation matrices for sexual and monetary discounting tasks.

Discounting Condition/Task 1 2 3 4 5 6 7
Sexual Delay Discounting Task
1.Most want to have sex with -
2.Least want to have sex with .26 -
(n = 22)
3.Most likely to have an STI .33 .57 -
(n = 25) (n = 29)
43Least likely to have an STI .62 .57 .48 -
(n = 25) (n = 25) (n = 26)
5.Monetary Delay Discounting Task -.10 .08 .16 .00 -
(n = 24) (n = 24) (n = 31) (n = 24)
Sexual Probability Discounting Task
6.Most want to have sex with .64 .46 .47 .60 .05 -
(n = 29) (n = 32) (n = 37) (n = 31) (n = 37)
7.Least want to have sex with .21 .55 .43 .60 -.01 .71 -
(n = 28) (n = 32) (n = 36) (n = 31) (n = 35) (n = 45)
8.Monetary Probability Discounting Task -.14 .38 .38 -.10 .18 .06 .02
(n = 29) (n = 32) (n = 37) (n = 31) (n = 36) (n = 46) (n = 44)

Note: Bolded text indicates significance (p <. 05).