Skip to main content
. 2015 May 20;9:889–901. doi: 10.2147/OPTH.S80972

Table 10.

Multicenter comparison of anatomic location of uveitis

UVA Centers
United states
International
MEEI3 Duke5 IA*10 UCLA*9 USC11 KY1 REH8 SBU7 UM6
Time period 1984–2014 1982–1992 1989–1994 1956–1960 1991–1994 2006–2007 1990–1995 1991–2013 2006–2010
Patients (N) 491 1,237 385 172 213 217,061 853 3,301 2,693 (ME)
4,379 (EU)
43 (FN)
45 (control)
Anterior uveitis (%) 67.6 51.6 25 60.0 (I)
63.0 (L)
90.6 (CBP)
60.6 (URP)
72 22.3 46 49.6 (ME)
51.3 (EU)
26.0 (FN)
73.0 (control)
Posterior uveitis (%) 12.6 17.4 24 29 (I)
19 (L)
4.7 (CBP)
14.6 (URP)
29 48.4 21.8 15.5 (ME)
23.7 (EU)
7.0 (FN)
2.0 (control)
Intermediate uveitis (%) 5.3 13 12 6 1.4 (CBP)
12.2 (URP)
6 10.9 11.1 10.3 (ME)
9.1 (EU)
0.0 (FN)
9.0 (control)
Panuveitis (%) 14.5 16 38 10.0 (I)
18.0 (L)
1.4 (CBP)
9.4 (URP)
21 18.4 21.1 24.9 (ME)
15.9 (EU)
67.0 (FN)
16.0 (control)

Notes:

*

IA and UCLA frequencies extrapolated from data, as different localization systems used.

Abbreviations: UVA, University of Virginia; MEEI, Massachusetts Eye and Ear Infirmary; Duke, Duke University; IA, University of Iowa; UCLA, University of California at Los Angeles; USC, University of Southern California; KY, University of Louisville, Kentucky; REH, The Royal Eye Hospital, Manchester, UK; SBU, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran; UM, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Canada; ME, Middle East; EU, Europe; FN, First Nation; L, London; I, Iowa; CBP, Community Based Practice; URP, University Referral Practice.