Table 4.
Results from Post-Hoc Pair-wise Comparisons
| Externalizing Comparison | t | p-value | df | Cohen’s d [95% CI] |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SEL vs. PBIS | −0.13 | 0.89 | 92 | 0.03 [−.35, .39] |
| SEL vs. COMBO | −2.71 | 0.008* | 97 | 0.57 [.12, 1.02] |
| SEL vs. BAU control | 3.44 | ≤ .001* | 90 | 0.72 [.43, 1.02] |
| PBIS vs. COMBO | −2.75 | 0.007* | 97 | 0.58 [.14, 1.01] |
| PBIS vs. BAU control | 4.15 | ≤ .001* | 90 | 0.87 [.63, 1.13] |
| COMBO vs. BAU | 5.26 | ≤ .001* | 95 | 1.12 [.67, 1.52] |
| Internalizing Comparison | t | p-value | df | Cohen’s d [95% CI] |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SEL vs. PBIS | 1.95 | 0.054 | 92 | 0.40 [.14, .67] |
| SEL vs. COMBO | −1.64 | 0.100 | 96 | 0.33 [.05, .71] |
| SEL vs. BAU control | 2.61 | 0.011 | 90 | 0.54 [.32, .79] |
| PBIS vs. COMBO | −3.12 | 0.002* | 96 | 0.64 [.27, .99] |
| PBIS vs. BAU control | 0.49 | 0.623 | 90 | 0.10 [−.11, .32] |
| COMBO vs. BAU | 3.54 | ≤ .001* | 94 | 0.74 [.38, 1.07] |
*
Significant at p ≤ .001