Skip to main content
. 2015 May 15;16:62. doi: 10.1186/s12875-015-0277-y

Table 4.

Differences in patient experience among carers

Unadjusted predictors of positive overall experience of care OR (95 %CI) p-value Adjusted predictors of positive overall experience of care OR (95 %CI)a p-value
Gender
 Male ref p = 0.03 ref p < 0.0001
 Female 1.04 (1.00 to 1.07) 1.16 (1.12 to 1.20)
Age group
 18–24 0.34 (0.32 to 0.37) p < 0.0001 0.38 (0.35 to 0.41) p < 0.0001
 25–34 0.44 (0.41 to 0.47) 0.48 (0.45 to 0.51)
 35–44 0.62 (0.58 to 0.65) 0.64 (0.61 to 0.68)
 45–54 0.74 (0.71 to 0.78) 0.75 (0.72 to 0.78)
 55–64 ref ref
 65–74 1.79 (1.69 to 1.90) 1.79 (1.69 to 1.90)
 75–84 2.61 (2.38 to 2.86) 2.61 (2.38 to 2.86)
 85+ 2.34 (1.93 to 2.82) 2.35 (1.94 to 2.84)
Ethnic group
 White ref p < 0.0001 ref p < 0.0001
 Mixed 0.55 (0.46 to 0.65) 0.80 (0.67 to 0.96)
 Asian 0.40 (0.37 to 0.42) 0.56 (0.52 to 0.59)
 Black 0.90 (0.80 to 1.02) 1.20 (1.06 to 1.36)
 Other ethnic group 0.64 (0.58 to 0.72) 0.88 (0.78 to 0.98)
Socio-economic deprivation
 1 (Affluent) ref p < 0.0001 ref p < 0.0001
 2 0.55 (0.46 to 0.65) 0.98 (0.92 to 1.03)
 3 0.40 (0.37 to 0.42) 0.94 (0.89 to 1.00)
 4 0.90 (0.80 to 1.02) 0.89 (0.84 to 0.94)
 5 (Deprived) 0.64 (0.58 to 0.72) 0.86 (0.81 to 0.92)

a Positive patient experience defined as endorsement of “very good” or “fairly good” in response to question “Overall, how would you describe your experience of your GP surgery?” Odds ratios < .1.0 represent a poorer patient experience. The results are presented adjusted for level of caring commitment, age, gender, deprivation, ethnicity and general practice