Skip to main content
. 2015 May 29;15:441. doi: 10.1186/s12885-015-1446-z

Table 3.

Results of Cox regression analyses for clinicopathological factors and CXCL16 in stromal cells (model 1) and co-expression of CXCL16 in cancer and stromal cells (model 2*)

Factor HR CI 95 % P
Tumor stage <0.001
T1 1.00
T2 1.60 (0.97–2.64) 0.065
T3 3.80 (2.13–6.77) <0.001
Nodal stage <0.001
N0 1.00
N1 2.01 (1.30–3.11) 0.002
N2 3.08 (1.74–5.44) <0.001
Differentiation 0.009
Well 1.00
Poor 1.17 (1.12–3.85) 0.020
Moderate 2.08 (0.63–2.20) 0.618
Performance status 0.040
0 1.00
1 1.52 (1.02–2.26) 0.040
2 2.15 (0.94–4.91) 0.069
Vascular infiltration
No 1.00
Yes 1.70 (1.01–2.87) 0.046
Histology <0.001
Squamous carcinoma 1.00
Adenocarcinoma 2.23 (1.48–3.35) <0.001
Large cell carcinoma 0.80 (0.39–1.66) 0.555
CXC16 stromal cells
Low 1
High 0.55 (0.35–0.87) 0.011
CXCL16 cancer and stromal cells* 0.031
Low/Low 1.00
Low/High + High/Low 0.57 (0.35–0.93) 0.023
Low/Low 0.42 (0.20–0.88) 0.022

Overall significance as prognostic marker. HR, hazard ratio; CI 95 %, 95 % confidence interval