Table 2.
Simple |
Complex |
|||
---|---|---|---|---|
Test | Results | Test | Results | |
Auditory training 1: Ferguson et al. (2014) (n = 44) | ||||
Speech perception | Digit Triplet Test in steady speech-shaped noise1 | NS within group for IT or DT (p > 0.05) | N/T | N/A |
Adaptive Sentence List in 8-Hz modulated noise2 | NS within group effect for IT or DT (p > 0.05) |
N/T | N/A | |
Cognition | Digit Span3 | NS within group for IT or DT (p > 0.05) | Visual letter monitoring4 1/s (fast) updating |
All trained: p = 0.003, d = 0.50 DT control: NS (p > 0.05) |
Test of Everyday Attention5 – single attention task | NS within group for IT or DT (p> 0.05) |
Test of Everyday Attention – dual task decrement | All trained: p = 0.001, d = 0.53 DT control: NS (p > 0.05) |
|
Communication | Glasgow Hearing Aid Benefit Profile6: Television set to set to level for others 1:1 conversation in no background noise Conversation in a busy street or shop |
NS within group for IT or DT (p > 0.05) | Glasgow Hearing Aid Benefit Profile: Having a conversation with several people in a group |
All trained: p = 0.005, d = 0.68 DT control: NS (p> 0.05) |
Auditory training 2: Henshaw and Ferguson (2014) (n = 30) | ||||
Speech perception | N/A | N/A | Competing speech7 | Trained period: p = 0.03, d = 0.47 Control period: NS (p > 0.05) |
Dual task of speech and memory8 | Trained period: p = 0.001, d = 0.77 Control period: NS (p > 0.05) |
IT, immediate trained; DT, delayed Trained; NS, no significant effect; N/T, not tested; N/A, not applicable. 1Smits et al. (2004), 2Millward et al. (2011),3Wechsler (1997), 4Gatehouse et al. (2003), 5Robertson et al. (1996), 6Gatehouse (1999), 7Hazan et al. (2009), 8Howard et al. (2010).