Skip to main content
. 2015 Jan 13;2015(1):CD010767. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010767.pub2

Comparison 2. IPT in high versus low endemic areas.

Outcome or subgroup title No. of studies No. of participants Statistical method Effect size
1 All cause mortality plus hospital admissions at 6 months 3 3160 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI) 0.90 [0.71, 1.13]
1.1 High endemicity 2 1960 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI) 0.92 [0.71, 1.19]
1.2 Low endemicity 1 1200 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI) 0.78 [0.43, 1.44]
2 Children with anaemia at 12 weeks 4 2237 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI) 0.97 [0.88, 1.07]
2.1 High endemicity 2 709 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI) 1.02 [0.90, 1.15]
2.2 Low endemicity 2 1528 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI) 0.89 [0.74, 1.07]
3 Mean change in Hb (baseline to 12 weeks) 4 1672 Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI) 0.32 [0.19, 0.45]
3.1 High endemicity 2 641 Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI) 0.35 [0.17, 0.53]
3.2 Low endemicity 2 1031 Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI) 0.29 [0.10, 0.48]
4 Mean Hb at 12 weeks 4 1672 Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI) 0.35 [0.06, 0.64]
4.1 High endemicity 2 641 Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI) 0.44 [‐0.03, 0.91]
4.2 Low endemicity 2 1031 Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI) 0.20 [0.01, 0.40]