Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2016 Jan 31.
Published in final edited form as: Am J Sports Med. 2014 Dec 23;43(2):310–319. doi: 10.1177/0363546514560880

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Figure 1

Figure 1

Figure 1

Case #1. Selected radiographic views: 1a: Weight bearing anteroposterior; 1b: 45° flexion-weight bearing (Rosenberg); 1c: 30° lateral; 1d: Full extension lateral.

Selected questions pertaining to tunnel location and number of corresponding “Yes” or “No” responses:
In regard to the PRIOR FEMORAL tunnel position at revision, is the tunnel ideal in terms of both position AND size? Yes: 0 No: 10
Do you feel that PRIMARY GRAFT FAILURE was due to insufficient FEMORAL FIXATION? Yes: 0 No: 10
In regard to the PRIOR FEMORAL tunnel position at revision, is the tunnel ideal in terms of position, but ENLARGED? Yes: 0 No: 10
In regard to the PRIOR FEMORAL tunnel position at revision, is the tunnel TOO VERTICAL? Yes: 3 No: 7
In regard to the PRIOR FEMORAL tunnel position at revision, is the tunnel TOO ANTERIOR? Yes: 9 No: 1
In regard to the PRIOR FEMORAL tunnel position at revision, is the tunnel TOO POSTERIOR? Yes: 0 No: 10
Do you feel that PRIMARY GRAFT FAILURE was due to insufficient TIBIAL FIXATION? Yes: 0 No: 10
In regard to the PRIOR TIBIAL tunnel position at revision, is the tunnel ideal in terms of both position AND size? Yes: 1 No: 9
In regard to the PRIOR TIBIAL tunnel position at revision, is the tunnel ideal in terms of position, but ENLARGED? Yes: 1 No: 9
In regard to the PRIOR TIBIAL tunnel position at revision, is the tunnel TOO MEDIAL? Yes: 0 No: 10
In regard to the PRIOR TIBIAL tunnel position at revision, is the tunnel TOO LATERAL? Yes: 2 No: 8
In regard to the PRIOR TIBIAL tunnel position at revision, is the tunnel TOO ANTERIOR? Yes: 8 No: 2
In regard to the PRIOR TIBIAL tunnel position at revision, is the tunnel TOO POSTERIOR? Yes: 0 No: 10