Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2016 Jan 31.
Published in final edited form as: Am J Sports Med. 2014 Dec 23;43(2):310–319. doi: 10.1177/0363546514560880

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Figure 2

Figure 2

Figure 2

Case #2. Selected radiographic views: 2a: Weight bearing anteroposterior; 2b: 45° flexion-weight bearing (Rosenberg); 2c: 30° lateral; 2d: Full extension lateral.

Selected questions pertaining to tunnel location and number of corresponding “Yes” or “No” responses:
In regard to the PRIOR FEMORAL tunnel position at revision, is the tunnel ideal in terms of both position AND size? Yes: 3 No: 7
Do you feel that PRIMARY GRAFT FAILURE was due to insufficient FEMORAL FIXATION? Yes: 0 No: 10
In regard to the PRIOR FEMORAL tunnel position at revision, is the tunnel ideal in terms of position, but ENLARGED? Yes: 4 No: 6
In regard to the PRIOR FEMORAL tunnel position at revision, is the tunnel TOO VERTICAL? Yes: 4 No: 6
In regard to the PRIOR FEMORAL tunnel position at revision, is the tunnel TOO ANTERIOR? Yes: 1 No: 9
In regard to the PRIOR FEMORAL tunnel position at revision, is the tunnel TOO POSTERIOR? Yes: 0 No: 10
Do you feel that PRIMARY GRAFT FAILURE was due to insufficient TIBIAL FIXATION? Yes: 0 No: 10
In regard to the PRIOR TIBIAL tunnel position at revision, is the tunnel ideal in terms of both position AND size? Yes: 4 No: 6
In regard to the PRIOR TIBIAL tunnel position at revision, is the tunnel ideal in terms of position, but ENLARGED? Yes: 4 No: 6
In regard to the PRIOR TIBIAL tunnel position at revision, is the tunnel TOO MEDIAL? Yes: 0 No: 10
In regard to the PRIOR TIBIAL tunnel position at revision, is the tunnel TOO LATERAL? Yes: 1 No: 9
In regard to the PRIOR TIBIAL tunnel position at revision, is the tunnel TOO ANTERIOR? Yes: 0 No: 10
In regard to the PRIOR TIBIAL tunnel position at revision, is the tunnel TOO POSTERIOR? Yes: 3 No: 7