Table 5.
ANOVA Table (A) and Post hoc Test Results (B) for Mean Amplitude in the 700–900 msec Time Window
| A. ANOVA (Denominator Lower Bound df = 4244; Upper Bound df = 4648)
| ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Coefficient | df | SumSq | MeanSq | F | p (Lower Bound) | p (Upper Bound) |
| Condition | 1 | 3.6 | 3.6 | 2.3 | .13 | .13 |
| ROI | 8 | 110.9 | 13.9 | 9.0 | <.0001 | <.0001 |
| Group | 1 | 0.1 | 0.1 | 0.01 | .92 | .92 |
| Condition × ROI | 8 | 432.0 | 54.0 | 34.9 | <.0001 | <.0001 |
| Condition × Group | 1 | 7.4 | 7.4 | 4.8 | .029 | .029 |
| B. Post hoc Analysis of the Condition× ROI Interaction
| |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Comparisons between ROIs | t | p (Lower Bound) | p (Upper Bound) |
| A vs. C | 7.9 | <.0001 | <.0001 |
| A vs. P | 13.8 | <.0001 | <.0001 |
| C vs. P | 6.9 | <.0001 | <.0001 |
| L vs. M | 1.4 | .99 | .99 |
| L vs. R | 3.5 | .003 | .003 |
| M vs. R | 2.0 | .27 | .27 |
Probability values in (B) were Bonferroni’s corrected for six comparisons; t tests were two-tailed. A = Anterior; C = central; P = posterior; L = left; M = midline; R = right.