Panel A: SSB consumption messages |
Experts link weight and SSB |
‘Experts say that 20 % of our nation’s weight problems have been caused by sugary drinks alone’ |
486 |
41·2 |
36·6, 45·9 |
SSB and child weight |
‘Eliminating just one sugary drink a day from a child’s life could help them lose 10–15 pounds in one year’ |
474 |
57·5 |
52·6, 62·2 |
Healthy habits learned in childhood |
‘Healthy habits are learned when children are young. It is important to reduce sugary drink consumption so that children do not continue unhealthy habits into adulthood’ |
490 |
76·9 |
72·7, 80·6 |
Panel B: pro-SSB tax messages |
Tax is a tool for parents |
‘Making sugary drinks more expensive gives parents a tool they can use to help discourage their kids’ unhealthy habits outside the home’ |
494 |
30·4 |
26·3, 34·9 |
Tax counteracts industry |
‘The soft drink industry unfairly targets children with their advertising. Money from a tax on sugary drinks could be used to counteract these ads and educate parents and children about the link between sugary drinks and obesity’ |
488 |
37·6 |
33·1, 42·3 |
Tax reduces consumption |
‘Experts say a tax on sugary drinks is the most effective thing you can do to reduce teen and adult consumption’ |
492 |
21·6 |
17·9, 25·8 |
Tax revenue for obesity prevention |
‘A penny-per-ounce tax on sugary drinks in the state could raise almost half a billion dollars over the next two years to fund obesity prevention efforts in our schools and community’ |
482 |
35·9 |
31·5, 40·7 |