Skip to main content
. 2014 Nov 28;18(12):2263–2273. doi: 10.1017/S1368980014002699

Table 1.

Sugar-sweetened beverage (SSB) consumption messages and pro-SSB tax messages

n % Convinced 95 % CI weighted
Panel A: SSB consumption messages
Experts link weight and SSB ‘Experts say that 20 % of our nation’s weight problems have been caused by sugary drinks alone’ 486 41·2 36·6, 45·9
SSB and child weight ‘Eliminating just one sugary drink a day from a child’s life could help them lose 10–15 pounds in one year’ 474 57·5 52·6, 62·2
Healthy habits learned in childhood ‘Healthy habits are learned when children are young. It is important to reduce sugary drink consumption so that children do not continue unhealthy habits into adulthood’ 490 76·9 72·7, 80·6
Panel B: pro-SSB tax messages
Tax is a tool for parents ‘Making sugary drinks more expensive gives parents a tool they can use to help discourage their kids’ unhealthy habits outside the home’ 494 30·4 26·3, 34·9
Tax counteracts industry ‘The soft drink industry unfairly targets children with their advertising. Money from a tax on sugary drinks could be used to counteract these ads and educate parents and children about the link between sugary drinks and obesity’ 488 37·6 33·1, 42·3
Tax reduces consumption ‘Experts say a tax on sugary drinks is the most effective thing you can do to reduce teen and adult consumption’ 492 21·6 17·9, 25·8
Tax revenue for obesity prevention ‘A penny-per-ounce tax on sugary drinks in the state could raise almost half a billion dollars over the next two years to fund obesity prevention efforts in our schools and community’ 482 35·9 31·5, 40·7