Skip to main content
. 2015 Jan 14;32(2):115–122. doi: 10.5604/20831862.1134558

TABLE 1.

Comparison of changes in performance measures between interventions

∆ (Post-Pre) ∆WBV—∆Sham †p †ES [95% CIs] †1–β
HG (N · kg −0.67 ) Post-WBV
Pre-WBV
24.1 ± 4.6
24.0 ± 4.8
0.083 ± 1.057 0.579 ± 0.984 0.018* 0.61 [0.35–0.86] 0.735
Post-Sham
Pre-Sham
23.8 ± 4.4
24.3 ± 4.7
-0.496 ± 0.891
SJ (cm) Post-WBV
Pre-WBV
54.0 ± 11.8
53.3 ± 11.6
0.700 ± 3.181 1.05 ± 6.60 0.483* 0.26 [– 0.11–0.63] 0.197
Post-Sham
Pre-Sham
52.0 ± 9.9
52.4 ± 9.9
-0.350 ± 5.071
TF (cm) Post-WBV
Pre-WBV
16.4 ± 5.4
15.9 ± 5.8
0.475 ± 1.155 0.290 ± 1.728 0.159* 0.55 [– 0.16–1.27] 0.646
Post-Sham
Pre-Sham
16.0 ± 6.0
15.8 ± 5.5
0.185 ± 1.091
ILS (N · kg −0.67 ) Post-WBV
Pre-WBV
73.8 ± 20.3
71.0 ± 17.7
2.85 ± 7.20 1.02 ± 9.29 0.743* 0.11 [– 0.22–0.44] 0.075
Post-Sham
Pre-Sham
70.1 ± 15.5
68.2 ± 14.2
1.84 ± 7.20

Note: Descriptive statistics are shown as mean ± standard deviation of raw data; †Calculated based on natural log-transformed data

*

p < 0.05

∆ = absolute change; CIs = confidence intervals; ES = effect size (Cohen's d,<0.2 = trivial, 0.2 ≤ d ≤ 0.5 = small, 0.5 ≤d ≤0.8 = medium, > 0.8 = large effect; 1–β = statistical power; HG = hand grip; ILS = isometric leg strength; SJ = squat jump; TF = trunk flexion; WBV = whole body vibration