Skip to main content
. 2015 Mar 30;30(6):1342–1351. doi: 10.1093/humrep/dev064

Table II.

Adjusted semen quality parameters [mean (95% CI)] according to the intake of fruits and vegetables.

Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 P valuea
Number of men 38 39 39 39
Median intake of fruits and vegetables (min, max) 1.5 (0.6, 2.2) 2.8 (2.2, 3.5) 4.1 (3.5, 4.8) 6.0 (4.9, 12.9)
Total sperm count (millions)
 Model 1b 140 (107, 183) 144 (107, 193) 106 (81, 139) 109 (83, 143) 0.14
 Model 2c 122 (89, 166) 144 (109, 189) 107 (86, 134) 133 (93, 191) 0.95
Sperm concentration (millions/ml)
 Model 1b 52.7 (38.9, 71.2) 55.1 (40.8, 74.4) 38.7 (30.1, 49.7) 53.8 (40.7, 71.2) 0.83
 Model 2c 50.2 (35.2, 71.5) 55.0 (41.1, 73.7) 38.3 (30.6, 47.9) 59.3 (41.1, 85.7) 0.93
Total motility (% PR + NP)
 Model 1b 47.9 (40.5, 55.3) 45.9 (38.4, 53.5) 43.2 (36.6, 49.9) 46.1 (39.5, 52.7) 0.67
 Model 2c 44.7 (36.5, 52.9) 45.6 (38.6, 52.7) 43.5 (37.3, 49.7) 51.5 (41.1, 61.8) 0.50
Progressive motility (% PR)
 Model 1b 27.3 (22.6, 32.0) 25.5 (20.8, 30.3) 27.3 (21.2, 33.4) 26.2 (22.1, 30.3) 0.84
 Model 2c 26.2 (21.1, 31.4) 25.8 (21.4, 30.3) 27.3 (21.2, 33.4) 28.0 (21.5, 34.4) 0.66
Sperm morphology (% normal)
 Model 1b 5.9 (4.9, 6.9) 5.9 (4.8, 7.0) 6.5 (5.5, 7.5) 6.9 (5.8, 7.9) 0.14
 Model 2c 6.2 (4.8, 7.6) 6.0 (4.9, 7.2) 6.4 (5.5, 7.2) 6.6 (5.1, 8.1) 0.71
Ejaculate volume (ml)
 Model 1b 3.0 (2.6, 3.4) 2.8 (2.5, 3.2) 3.1 (2.6, 3.5) 2.4 (2.0, 2.8)* 0.06
 Model 2c 2.9 (2.3, 3.4) 2.9 (2.5, 3.2) 3.1 (2.7, 3.5) 2.5 (2.0, 3.0) 0.55

PR, progressive motility; NP, non-progressive motility; CI: confidence interval.

aEstimated using median intake in each quartile as a continuous variable.

bModel 1 was adjusted for total energy intake, abstinence time (missing, 0–2 days, 2–3 days, 3–4 days and ≥4 days).

cModel 2 was adjusted for total energy intake, abstinence time, age, BMI, moderate-vigorous physical activity, race, prudent and western dietary patterns, smoking status and history of varicocele.

*P-value for trend <0.05 compared with men in the lowest quartile of intake.