Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2016 May 15.
Published in final edited form as: J Chromatogr A. 2015 Mar 7;1394:111–117. doi: 10.1016/j.chroma.2015.03.001

Table 2.

Alignment results for each peak as a function of mass spectral (MS) match scores

Compound MS Match Scorea Statistical Compare Concernsb
900 800 700 600 500 400 300 200 100

2-Ethoxy-2-methylpropane SM, shared apex

2-Pentanone SM, shared apex

Toluene SM

2-Hexanone shared apex

3-Heptanone

2-Heptanone

Heptanal

4-Methyl-2-heptanone SM

Phenol

Benzaldehyde

2-Nonanone shared apex

Acetophenone

Nonanal shared apex

Benzothiazole

2-Undecanone shared apex

4-Propylbenzaldehyde
a

Shaded blocks indicate that the compound was aligned for the indicated minimum MS match scores. Full alignment results are provided in Tables S1–16.

b

Concerns reported in the Statistical Compare alignment peak table for MS match score 600; SM = saturated mass.