Skip to main content
. 2014 Oct 29;(10):4–123. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010705.pub2

Hillemann 2009

Study characteristics
Patient sampling Case-control design with the random enrolment of participants, prospective data collection for clinical specimens, retrospective for culture isolates
Patient characteristics and setting
  1. Country of origin: Germany

  2. World Bank classification of country: high

  3. Type of lab: reference

  4. Type of patients: confirmed XDR-TB cases, confirmed DS-TB cases

  5. The specimens tested were smear positive and smear negative

Index tests
  1. Manufacturer involvement: yes, donation of tests

  2. Type of testing: direct and indirect

  3. Type of specimens: smear-positive

  4. Specimen treatment: NALC-NaOH

  5. Specimen condition: frozen

  6. Duration of freezing: = 1 year

Target condition and reference standard(s)
  1. Culture (liquid and solid; MGIT 960 and LJ) and sequencing used for FQ, SLID

  2. FQ drugs: ofloxacin (2 µg/mL for liquid)

  3. SLIDs: amikacin (1 µg/mL for liquid) and capreomycin (2.5 µg/mL for liquid)

  4. Genes sequenced for FQ: gyrA

  5. Genes sequenced for SLIDs: rrs

  6. Discrepant analysis: no

Flow and timing Uninterpretable results reported: yes
Comparative
Notes
Methodological quality
Item Authors' judgement Risk of bias Applicability concerns
DOMAIN 1: Patient Selection
Was a consecutive or random sample of patients enrolled? Yes
Was a case-control design avoided? No
Did the study avoid inappropriate exclusions? Yes
High
DOMAIN 2: Index Test All tests
Were the index test results interpreted without knowledge of the results of the reference standard? Unclear
If a threshold was used, was it pre-specified? Yes
Low
DOMAIN 3: Reference Standard
Is the reference standards likely to correctly classify the target condition? Yes
Were the reference standard results interpreted without knowledge of the results of the index tests? Unclear
Low
DOMAIN 4: Flow and Timing
Was there an appropriate interval between index test and reference standard? Yes
Did all patients receive the same reference standard? Yes
Were all patients included in the analysis? Yes