Hillemann 2009
Study characteristics | |||
Patient sampling | Case-control design with the random enrolment of participants, prospective data collection for clinical specimens, retrospective for culture isolates | ||
Patient characteristics and setting |
|
||
Index tests |
|
||
Target condition and reference standard(s) |
|
||
Flow and timing | Uninterpretable results reported: yes | ||
Comparative | |||
Notes | |||
Methodological quality | |||
Item | Authors' judgement | Risk of bias | Applicability concerns |
DOMAIN 1: Patient Selection | |||
Was a consecutive or random sample of patients enrolled? | Yes | ||
Was a case-control design avoided? | No | ||
Did the study avoid inappropriate exclusions? | Yes | ||
High | |||
DOMAIN 2: Index Test All tests | |||
Were the index test results interpreted without knowledge of the results of the reference standard? | Unclear | ||
If a threshold was used, was it pre-specified? | Yes | ||
Low | |||
DOMAIN 3: Reference Standard | |||
Is the reference standards likely to correctly classify the target condition? | Yes | ||
Were the reference standard results interpreted without knowledge of the results of the index tests? | Unclear | ||
Low | |||
DOMAIN 4: Flow and Timing | |||
Was there an appropriate interval between index test and reference standard? | Yes | ||
Did all patients receive the same reference standard? | Yes | ||
Were all patients included in the analysis? | Yes | ||