Study characteristics |
|
Patient sampling |
Cross-sectional design with convenience-based enrolment of participants, prospective data collection |
Patient characteristics and setting |
Country of origin: Spain
World Bank classification of country: high
Type of lab: hospital
Type of patients: confirmed MDR-TB cases
Smear-positive patients whose specimens were tested directed: 49/54
|
Index tests |
Manufacturer involvement: no
Type of testing: direct and indirect
Type of specimens: smear-positive and smear negative
Specimen treatment: NALC-NaOH
Specimen condition: frozen
Duration of freezing: = 1 year
|
Target condition and reference standard(s) |
Culture (liquid; BACTEC460TB) used for FQ, SLID
FQ drugs: moxifloxacin (0.5 µg/mL)
SLIDs: kanamycin (5 µg/mL) and capreomycin (1.25 µg/mL)
Discrepant analysis: yes (for indirect testing only)
|
Flow and timing |
Uninterpretable results reported: yes |
Comparative |
|
Notes |
|
Methodological quality |
|
Item |
Authors' judgement |
Risk of bias |
Applicability concerns |
DOMAIN 1: Patient Selection |
|
Was a consecutive or random sample of patients enrolled? |
No |
|
|
Was a case-control design avoided? |
Yes |
|
|
Did the study avoid inappropriate exclusions? |
Yes |
|
|
|
|
|
Low |
DOMAIN 2: Index Test All tests |
|
Were the index test results interpreted without knowledge of the results of the reference standard? |
Yes |
|
|
If a threshold was used, was it pre-specified? |
Yes |
|
|
|
|
|
Low |
DOMAIN 3: Reference Standard |
|
Is the reference standards likely to correctly classify the target condition? |
Yes |
|
|
Were the reference standard results interpreted without knowledge of the results of the index tests? |
No |
|
|
|
|
|
Low |
DOMAIN 4: Flow and Timing |
|
Was there an appropriate interval between index test and reference standard? |
Yes |
|
|
Did all patients receive the same reference standard? |
No |
|
|
Were all patients included in the analysis? |
Yes |
|
|
|
|
|
|