Skip to main content
. 2015 Apr 29;(4):CD008138. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD008138.pub2

Diehl 2013

Methods Individual randomised controlled trials
Participants Inclusion criteria: patients older than 18 years with facial seborrhoeic dermatitis, diagnosis confirmed by investigator that they were not on any treatment that could interfere with test products
Exclusion criteria: pregnant women, immunocompromised persons, patients with previous history of cancer
Age: QX (15.7 ± 6.99), 2% keto (14.64 ± 8.33)
Sex, M:F: QX (9:11), 2% keto (10:10)
Interventions Intervention: aqueous gel containing 4% extract of Quassia amara applied twice a day to the face for 28 days (n = 20)
Control 1: ketoconazole 2% gel applied similarly (n = 20)
Control 2: ciclopirox olamine 1% gel applied similarly (n = 20)
Outcomes Complete remission as determined by the investigator
Notes Country: Argentina; COI: no disclosure of COI
Risk of bias
Bias Authors' judgement Support for judgement
Random sequence generation (selection bias) Low risk Investigators used a tool, the Researcher Randomizer, version 3.0; http:.//www.randomizer.org
Allocation concealment (selection bias) Unclear risk "randomized double blind study"
Baseline comparable? Low risk Ketoconazole patients on average 5 years older; gender, duration, previous treatment similar
Patient blinded? Unclear risk Not reported
Provider blinded? Unclear risk Not reported
Outcome assessor blinded? Unclear risk Not reported
Co-interventions avoided? Low risk No other treatment allowed
Compliance acceptable? Unclear risk Not reported
Drop-out acceptable? Low risk 3/20 in ketoconazole group, 2/20 in Quassia group, 1/20 in ciclopirox group
Selective outcome reporting acceptable? High risk Table 4 is missing; not all remission categories reported
ITT? Unclear risk Not reported and unclear imputation for missing data