Diehl 2013
| Methods | Individual randomised controlled trials | |
| Participants | Inclusion criteria: patients older than 18 years with facial seborrhoeic dermatitis, diagnosis confirmed by investigator that they were not on any treatment that could interfere with test products Exclusion criteria: pregnant women, immunocompromised persons, patients with previous history of cancer Age: QX (15.7 ± 6.99), 2% keto (14.64 ± 8.33) Sex, M:F: QX (9:11), 2% keto (10:10) |
|
| Interventions | Intervention: aqueous gel containing 4% extract of Quassia amara applied twice a day to the face for 28 days (n = 20) Control 1: ketoconazole 2% gel applied similarly (n = 20) Control 2: ciclopirox olamine 1% gel applied similarly (n = 20) |
|
| Outcomes | Complete remission as determined by the investigator | |
| Notes | Country: Argentina; COI: no disclosure of COI | |
| Risk of bias | ||
| Bias | Authors' judgement | Support for judgement |
| Random sequence generation (selection bias) | Low risk | Investigators used a tool, the Researcher Randomizer, version 3.0; http:.//www.randomizer.org |
| Allocation concealment (selection bias) | Unclear risk | "randomized double blind study" |
| Baseline comparable? | Low risk | Ketoconazole patients on average 5 years older; gender, duration, previous treatment similar |
| Patient blinded? | Unclear risk | Not reported |
| Provider blinded? | Unclear risk | Not reported |
| Outcome assessor blinded? | Unclear risk | Not reported |
| Co-interventions avoided? | Low risk | No other treatment allowed |
| Compliance acceptable? | Unclear risk | Not reported |
| Drop-out acceptable? | Low risk | 3/20 in ketoconazole group, 2/20 in Quassia group, 1/20 in ciclopirox group |
| Selective outcome reporting acceptable? | High risk | Table 4 is missing; not all remission categories reported |
| ITT? | Unclear risk | Not reported and unclear imputation for missing data |