Shuttleworth 1998
Methods | Individual randomised controlled trials | |
Participants | Diagnosis: dandruff diagnosed by a physician. Participant must have dandruff on both sides of the scalp, females must be on contraception Exclusion criteria: allergies to shampoos; pregnancy, lactation; recent use of medication that can affect test shampoo; eye disease that could be exacerbated by study; history of photosensitivity and history of corticosteroid use in the 2 weeks preceding the study |
|
Interventions | Intervention: 1.5% ciclopirox olamine shampoo applied twice weekly to scalp (n = 22) Control 1: unmedicated (placebo) shampoo base applied twice weekly to scalp for 4 weeks (n = 22) Control 2: ketoconazole 2% applied twice weekly to scalp for 4 weeks (n = 22) |
|
Outcomes | Symptom severity score for erythema and scaling | |
Notes | Country: UK Sponsorship by Stiefel Labs; study was conducted by Pharmaco UK Ltd Adverse effect: scalp irritation in keto group (2/32) |
|
Risk of bias | ||
Bias | Authors' judgement | Support for judgement |
Random sequence generation (selection bias) | Unclear risk | "... according to a predetermined randomization schedule" |
Allocation concealment (selection bias) | Unclear risk | Not reported |
Baseline comparable? | Unclear risk | "The groups were balanced with respect to age, sex, presence of seborrhoeic dermatitis ...." No tabulated data from which to ascertain this |
Patient blinded? | Unclear risk | ".. double blinded ..." |
Provider blinded? | Unclear risk | ".. double blinded ..." |
Outcome assessor blinded? | Unclear risk | ".. double blinded ..." |
Co-interventions avoided? | Unclear risk | Not reported |
Compliance acceptable? | Unclear risk | Not reported |
Drop-out acceptable? | Low risk | ".. two subjects failed to complete the study for personal reasons unrelated to the shampoo" |
Selective outcome reporting acceptable? | Low risk | All outcomes reported |
ITT? | Unclear risk | Not reported |