Skip to main content
. 2015 Apr 24;6(3):255–259. doi: 10.1111/1759-7714.12174

Table 3.

Comparison of short-term efficacy between upper and lower lung tracking methods

Upper lung CR PR SD ORR
Synchrony 17 (53.13%) 11 (34.38%) 4 (12.50%) 28 (87.50%)
Xsight spine 5 (31.25%) 7 (43.75%) 4 (25.00%) 12 (75.00%)
P-value X2 = 2.36, P = 0.31
Lower lung CR PR SD ORR
Synchrony 4 (26.67%) 11 (73.33%) 0 (0.00%) 15 (100.00%)
Xsight spine 1 (9.09%) 7 (63.64%) 3 (27.27%) 8 (72.73%)
P-value X2 = 4.63, P = 0.032