Table 4.
Comparison of short-term efficacy of treatment volume between the two methods
Treatment volume <15 mL | CR | PR | SD | ORR |
---|---|---|---|---|
Synchrony | 13 (48.15%) | 12 (44.44%) | 2 (7.41%) | 25 (92.59%) |
Xsight spine | 2 (11.77%) | 10 (58.82%) | 5 (29.41%) | 12 (70.59%) |
P-value | X2 = 6.53, P = 0.038 |
Treatment volume ≥15 mL | CR | PR | SD | ORR |
---|---|---|---|---|
Synchrony | 7 (38.89%) | 10 (55.56%) | 1 (5.56%) | 17 (94.44%) |
Xsight spine | 4 (40.00%) | 4 (40.00%) | 2 (20.00%) | 8 (80.00%) |
P-value | X2 = 1.57, P = 0.46 |