Skip to main content
. 2015 Apr 24;6(3):255–259. doi: 10.1111/1759-7714.12174

Table 4.

Comparison of short-term efficacy of treatment volume between the two methods

Treatment volume <15 mL CR PR SD ORR
Synchrony 13 (48.15%) 12 (44.44%) 2 (7.41%) 25 (92.59%)
Xsight spine 2 (11.77%) 10 (58.82%) 5 (29.41%) 12 (70.59%)
P-value X2 = 6.53, P = 0.038
Treatment volume ≥15 mL CR PR SD ORR
Synchrony 7 (38.89%) 10 (55.56%) 1 (5.56%) 17 (94.44%)
Xsight spine 4 (40.00%) 4 (40.00%) 2 (20.00%) 8 (80.00%)
P-value X2 = 1.57, P = 0.46