Skip to main content
. 2015 Jan 7;6(1):49–57. doi: 10.1111/1759-7714.12142

Table 5.

Comparison of dosimetric parameters between VMAT and IMRT

Variable Volume (mean ± sd, cm3) VMAT IMRT P-value Ratio of volume and dose (mean ± sd, %) VMAT IMRT P-value
TLV 3171.2 ± 470.64 3215.8 ± 729.71 0.795
V5 2344.4 ± 542.91 2041.1 ± 738.73 0.091 0.74 ± 0.10 0.63 ± 0.14 0.002
V10 1591.2 ± 378.25 1440.9 ± 547.13 0.250 0.50 ± 0.11 0.44 ± 0.10 0.023
V15 1013.0 ± 265.56 983.48 ± 381.53 0.745 0.32 ± 0.08 0.30 ± 0.07 0.319
V20 707.49 ± 203.59 640.59 ± 233.55 0.254 0.22 ± 0.06 0.19 ± 0.05 0.066
V25 500.48 ± 169.91 428.06 ± 172.64 0.109 0.16 ± 0.05 0.13 ± 0.04 0.029
V30 363.69 ± 146.39 287.86 ± 132.73 0.037 0.10 ± 0.04 0.09 ± 0.03 0.011
MLD (Gy) 13.12 ± 2.36 11.59 ± 2.18 0.009

IMRT, intensity modulated radiation therapy; MLD, mean lung dose; sd, standard deviation; TLV, total lung volume; V5, V10,V15,V20,V25, V30, percentage of lung receiving ≥ 5 Gy (through 30 Gy); VMAT, volumetric modulated arc therapy.