Skip to main content
. 2015 May 29;10(5):e0125655. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0125655

Table 1. Demographics of cohort studies included in the meta-analysis.

Author(year published) Patients/n IBR/Control Age, yearsIBR/Control Region of study Follow-up/mIBR/Control Adjuvant treatments Mastectomy type Reconstruction type Study Design
Noguchi[19] 83/153 82/47.7 a Japan 41/58 CT MT LDM, TRAM, Retrospective cohort study
(1992) Implant
Yoshimura[20] 122/92 44/50 b Japan 78/55 CT NMT NMT +Implant Retrospective cohort study
(1996)
Murphy[21] 158/1262 48/66 b USA 75/75 NA MT Implant, TRAM, Retrospective cohort study
(2002) LD+implant
Petit[22] 518/159 69.3/22 a Italy 70/71 CT, HT MT Implant, TRAM, Retrospective cohort study
(2008) LD+implant
Ueda[23] 74/178 45.7/55 c Japan 50/54 CT, HT, RT MT SMIBR+TRAM, Prospective cohort study
(2008) LD, Implant, DIEP
McCarthy[24] 309/309 46.8/50.8 c USA 68.4/68.4 CT, HT, RT MT Implant, tissue, Retrospective cohort study (matched)
(2008) expander
Gerber[25] 108/130 47/58 b Germany 101/101 CT, RT MT SMIBR+LD, Historical prospective cohort study
(2009) implant
Min [26] 120/1699 40.7/47.6 b Korea 42.1/39.2 CT, RT BCS LD Retrospective cohort study
(2010)
Lim[27] 87/810 38.4/47.4 b Korea 62.5/65 CT, HT, RT MT SMIBR+TRAM, Retrospective cohort study (matched)
(2010) LD, implant
Noguchi[19] 83/153 82/47.7 a Japan 41/58 CT MT LDM, TRAM, Retrospective cohort study
(1992) Implant
Yoshimura[20] 122/92 44/50 b Japan 78/55 CT NMT NMT +Implant Retrospective cohort study
(1996)
Murphy[21] 158/1262 48/66 b USA 75/75 NA MT Implant, TRAM, Retrospective cohort study
(2002) LD+implant
Petit[22] 518/159 69.3/22 a Italy 70/71 CT, HT MT Implant, TRAM, Retrospective cohort study
(2008) LD+implant
Ueda[23] 74/178 45.7/55 c Japan 50/54 CT, HT, RT MT SMIBR+TRAM, Prospective cohort study
(2008) LD, Implant, DIEP
McCarthy[24] 309/309 46.8/50.8 c USA 68.4/68.4 CT, HT, RT MT Implant, tissue, Retrospective cohort study (matched)
(2008) expander
Gerber[25] 108/130 47/58 b Germany 101/101 CT, RT MT SMIBR+LD, Historical prospective cohort study
(2009) implant
Min [26] 120/1699 40.7/47.6 b Korea 42.1/39.2 CT, RT BCS LD Retrospective cohort study
(2010)
Lim[27] 87/810 38.4/47.4 b Korea 62.5/65 CT, HT, RT MT SMIBR+TRAM, Retrospective cohort study (matched)
(2010) LD, implant
Eriksen[28] 300/300 48/48 c Sweden 144/138 CT, HT, RT MT implant Retrospective cohort study
(2011)
Nedumpara[29] 135/452 47/59 c England 55/55 CT, HT, RT MT LD, implant Retrospective cohort study
(2011)
Reddy[30] 494/427 c 47.8/56.4 c USA 54/54 CT, HT, RT MT DIEP, LD, TRAM, SGAP, SIEA, implant Retrospective cohort study
(2011)
Lee[31] 1000/3183 42.2/47.9 b Korea 56.4/60 NA MT TRAM Retrospective cohort study
(2012)
Ota[32] 133/308 46/58 c Japan 47/44 CT, HT, RT MT TE Prospective cohort study
(2014)

a Percentage of patients younger than 50 years

b mean age

c median age.

N:number, m:months, BCS, breast conserving surgery, CT: chemotherapy, DIEP: deep inferior epigastric perforator, HT: hormonal therapy, IBR, immediate breast reconstruction, LD: latissimus dorsi, MT: mastectomy, RT: radiation therapy, S-GAP: superior Gluteus artery perforator, SIEA: superficial inferior epigastric artery flap, SMIBR: skin-sparing/nipple-sparing mastectomy and immediate breast reconstruction, TE: tissue expander, TRAM: transverse rectus abdominis musculocutaneous; NMT: nipple-preserving mastectomy