Skip to main content
. 2015 May 29;10(5):e0127356. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0127356

Table 3. Meta-analysis results for OS and DFS.

Analysis OS DFS
N HR(95% CI) I2 Ph P N HR(95% CI) I2 Ph P
16 1.809(1.442–2.270) 63.3% <0.001 <0.001 5 1.481(1.028–2.133) 71.4% 0.007 0.035
Subgroup1: digestive tract 12 1.875(1.426–2.464) 66.5% 0.001 <0.001
Digestive gland 4 1.636(1.056–2.536) 57.4% 0.070 0.028
Subgroup2: surgery 13 1.871(1.425–2.458) 65.0% 0.052 <0.001
Non-surgical 2 1.361(0.640–2.895) 73.4% 0.001 0.423
Subgroup3: Caucasian 5 1.656(1.067–2.571) 72.8% 0.005 0.025
Asian 11 1.873(1.415–2.481) 61.7% 0.004 <0.001
Subgroup4: E 8 1.490(1.101–2.016) 60.0% 0.015 0.010
I 1 1.610(1.109–2.338) - - 0.012
EI 7 2.430(1.622–3.641) 66.7% 0.006 <0.001
Subgroup5: Sample size≥200 4 1.846(1.542–2.209) 0 0.416 <0.001
Sample size<200 12 1.818(1.276–2.591) 70.9% <0.001 0.001
Subgroup6: Rabbit pAb 11 1.918(1.394–2.640) 69.0% <0.001 <0.001
others 3 1.947(1.448–2.617) 0 0.392 <0.001

Ph: p value of Q test for heterogeneity test; N: number of studies (cohorts); HR: hazard ratio; 95% CI: 95% confidence interval; OS: overall survival; DFS: progression-free survival; E: extent; I: intensity; Rabbit pAb: rabbit polyclonal antibody