Table 2.
Linear regression analyses on mean carotid intima-media thickness in relation to lnCRP or fibriongen (standardized regression coefficient)
| Japanese |
Japanese-American |
US white |
Total* |
|||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Coefficient | P value | Coefficient | P value | Coefficient | P value | Coefficient | P value | |
| ln CRP | ||||||||
| Model 1† | 0.14 | 0.01 | 0.08 | 0.20 | 0.11 | 0.06 | 0.10 | 0.002 |
| Model 2† | 0.09 | 0.11 | −0.03 | 0.59 | 0.05 | 0.38 | 0.04 | 0.29 |
| Model 3† | 0.10 | 0.07 | −0.01 | 0.91 | 0.05 | 0.38 | 0.01 | 0.72 |
| Fibrinogen | ||||||||
| Model 1† | 0.05 | 0.41 | 0.19 | 0.08 | 0.12 | 0.17 | 0.08 | 0.02 |
| Model 2† | 0.00 | 0.99 | 0.06 | 0.28 | 0.05 | 0.36 | 0.05 | 0.15 |
| Model 3† | 0.01 | 0.90 | 0.11 | 0.33 | 0.04 | 0.94 | 0.03 | 0.32 |
Model 1 was adjusted for age. Model 2 adjusted for age, systolic blood pressure, LDL-cholesterol, HDL-choleseterol, fasting glucose, smokng, and alcohol consumption. Model 3 was adjusted for age and body mass index.
All models were adjusted for population in addition to the total participants.