Skip to main content
. 2012 Apr;24(2):153–174. doi: 10.1177/1079063211404250

Table 3.

Incremental Validity of Measures for Nonsexual Recidivism (With J-SOAP-II as 1st Predictor)

B SE Wald p Exp(B) 95% CI ΔR2
Step 1
 J-SOAP-II 0.14 .04 14.20 < .001 1.15 [1.07, 1.23]
Step 2
 J-SOAP-II1 – ERASOR_ OCR2 (1) 0.11 .04 6.60 .010 1.12 [1.03, 1.22]
(2) 0.42 .48 0.76 .380 1.52 [0.59, 3.89] <.01
 J-SOAP-II1 – ERASOR_ Total2 (1) 0.17 .05 10.49 .001 1.18 [1.07, 1.31]
(2) −0.06 .06 0.82 .367 0.95 [0.84, 1.07] .01
 J-SOAP-II1 – YLS/CMI2 (1) 0.16 .05 10.89 .001 1.17 [1.07, 1.29]
(2) −0.04 .05 0.54 .462 0.97 [0.88, 1.06] <.01
Step 3
 J-SOAP-II1 – ERASOR_ OCR2 – YLS/ CMI3 (1) 0.13 .06 5.17 .023 1.14 [1.02, 1.28]
(2) 0.35 .50 .50 .480 1.42 [0.54, 3.74]
(3) −0.03 .50 .30 .587 0.97 [0.88, 1.07] <.01
 J-SOAP-II1 – ERASOR_ Total2 – YLS/ CMI3 (1) 0.19 .06 9.80 .002 1.21 [1.07, 1.36]
(2) −0.06 .06 0.81 .369 0.95 [0.84, 1.07]
(3) −0.04 .05 0.53 .465 0.96 [0.87, 1.06] <.01
 J-SOAP-II1 – YLS/CMI2 – ERASOR_ OCR3 (1) 0.13 .06 5.17 .023 1.14 [1.02, 1.28]
(2) −0.03 .05 0.30 .587 0.97 [0.88, 1.07]
(3) 0.35 .50 0.50 .480 1.42 [0.54, 3.74] <.01
 J-SOAP-II1 – YLS/CMI2 – ERASOR_ Total3 (1) 0.19 .06 9.80 .002 1.21 [1.07, 1.36]
(2) −0.04 .05 0.53 .465 0.96 [0.87, 1.06]
(3) −0.06 .06 0.81 .369 0.95 [0.84, 1.07] .01

Note. 1 = First predictor, 2 = Second predictor, 3 = Third predictor