Table 4.

Incremental Validity of Measures for Nonsexual Recidivism (With ERASOR as 1st Predictor)

		B	SE	Wald	p	Exp(B)	95% CI	ΔR2
ERASOR_OCR entered as 1st predictor
Step 1
ERASOR_OCR		1.15	.36	9.96	.002	3.16	[1.55, 6.45]	—
Step 2
ERASOR_OCR1 – J-SOAP-II2	(1)	0.42	.48	0.76	.384	1.52	[0.59, 3.89]
	(2)	0.11	.04	6.60	.010	1.12	[1.03, 1.22]	.09
ERASOR_OCR1 – YLS/CMI2	(1)	1.03	.38	7.32	.007	2.81	[1.33, 5.92]
	(2)	0.05	.04	2.07	.151	1.05	[0.98, 1.13]	.03
Step 3
ERASOR_OCR1 – J-SOAP-II2 – YLS/CMI3	(1)	0.35	.50	0.50	.480	1.42	[0.54, 3.74]
	(2)	0.13	.06	5.17	.023	1.14	[1.02, 1.28]
	(3)	−0.03	.05	0.30	.587	0.97	[0.88, 1.07]	<.01
ERASOR_OCR1 – YLS/CMI2 – J-SOAP- II3	(1)	0.35	.50	0.50	.480	1.42	[0.54, 3.74]
	(2)	−0.03	.05	0.30	.587	0.97	[0.88, 1.07]
	(3)	0.13	.06	5.17	.023	1.14	[1.02, 1.28]	.07
ERASOR_Total entered as 1st predictor
Step 1
ERASOR_Total		0.09	.04	5.04	.025	1.09	[1.01, 1.17]	—
Step 2
ERASOR_Total1 – J-SOAP-II2	(1)	−0.06	.06	0.82	.367	0.95	[0.84, 1.07]
	(2)	0.17	.05	10.49	.001	1.18	[1.07, 1.31]	.17
ERASOR_Total1 – YLS/CMI2	(1)	0.06	.04	1.88	.171	1.06	[0.98, 1.15]
	(2)	0.05	.04	2.06	.152	1.05	[0.98, 1.13]	.03
Step 3
ERASOR_Total1 – J-SOAP-II2 – YLS/CMI3	(1)	−0.06	.06	0.81	.369	0.95	[0.84, 1.07]
	(2)	0.19	.06	9.80	.002	1.21	[1.07, 1.36]
	(3)	−0.04	.05	0.53	.465	0.96	[0.87, 1.06]	<.01
ERASOR_Total1 – YLS/CMI2 – J-SOAP- II3	(1)	−0.06	.06	0.81	.369	0.95	[0.84, 1.07]
	(2)	−0.04	.05	0.53	.465	0.96	[0.87, 1.06]
	(3)	0.19	.06	9.80	.002	1.21	[1.07, 1.36]	.15

Note. ¹ = First predictor, ² = Second predictor, ³ = Third predictor