Table 5.

Incremental Validity of Measures for Nonsexual Recidivism (With YLS/CMI as 1st Predictor)

		B	SE	Wald	p	Exp(B)	95% CI	ΔR2
Step 1
YLS/CMI		0.08	.03	5.21	.022	1.08	[1.01, 1.15]	—
Step 2
YLS/CMI1 – J-SOAP-II2	(1)	−0.04	.05	0.54	.462	0.97	[0.88, 1.06]
	(2)	0.16	.05	10.89	.001	1.17	[1.07, 1.29]	.17
YLS/CMI1 – ERASOR_OCR2	(1)	0.05	.04	2.07	.151	1.05	[0.98, 1.13]
	(2)	1.03	.38	7.32	.007	2.81	[1.33, 5.92]	.10
YLS/CMI1 – ERASOR_Total2	(1)	0.05	.04	2.06	.152	1.05	[0.98, 1.13]
	(2)	0.06	.04	1.88	.171	1.06	[0.98, 1.15]	.03
Step 3
YLS/CMI1 – J-SOAP-II2 – ERASOR_OCR3	(1)	−0.03	.05	0.30	.587	0.97	[0.88, 1.07]
	(2)	0.13	.06	5.17	.023	1.14	[1.02, 1.28]
	(3)	0.35	.50	0.50	.480	1.42	[0.54, 3.74]	<.01
YLS/CMI1 – J-SOAP-II2 – ERASOR_Total3	(1)	−0.04	.05	0.53	.465	0.96	[0.87, 1.06]
	(2)	0.19	.06	9.80	.002	1.21	[1.07, 1.36]
	(3)	−0.06	.06	0.81	.369	0.95	[0.84, 1.07]	.01
YLS/CMI1 – ERASOR_OCR2 – J-SOAP- II3	(1)	−0.03	.05	0.30	.587	097	[0.88, 1.07]
	(2)	0.35	.50	0.50	.480	1.42	[0.54, 3.74]
	(3)	0.13	.06	5.17	.023	1.14	[1.02, 1.28]	.07
YLS/CMI1 – ERASOR_Total2 – J-SOAP- II3	(1)	−0.04	.05	0.53	.465	0.96	[0.87, 1.06]
	(2)	−0.06	.06	0.81	.369	0.95	[0.84, 1.07]
	(3)	0.19	.06	9.80	.002	1.14	[1.07, 1.36]	.15

Note. ¹ = First predictor, ² = Second predictor, ³ = Third predictor